Abstain from Every Form of Evil
The Reflector - November 2009
Written by: Edward O. Bragwell, Sr
Christians are to walk in the light even as their Lord is in the light. (1 John 1:7). Thus their lives are
to be spent in practicing and promoting good, while refraining from and denouncing evil. They are called
upon to abhor evil , (Romans 12:9) and to abstain from “every form” of it (1 Thessalonians 5:22 NKJ). Evil
comes in many forms, some are very subtle, others are more blatant. As a Christian, one wants to please the
Lord and keep his conduct above reproach. When he sins he corrects it as soon as he becomes aware of it –
by repenting, confessing, and asking God’s forgiveness in prayer. (Acts 8:22; 1 John 1:7-9). There are
three basic forms of evil that we need to be aware of and seek to avoid.
Unconditional Evil
There are things that are inherently “unlawful” or “unclean” (2 Corinthians 6:17). Such things are
evil, anywhere, anytime, for anyone.
Yes, I am aware that Paul wrote that there is “nothing unclean of itself” (Romans 14:14) and “all
things are lawful.” (1 Corinthians 10:23). In these two verses, the “nothing” and “all” are limited by
the context. In both cases, he was discussing the eating of certain meats. Because of the context, he
is effectively saying “none of these things are unclean” and “all of these things are lawful.
It was inherently sinful (“not lawful”) for King Herod to have been married to his brother’s wife.
(Matthew 14:4).
The “works of the flesh” and “such like” are unconditionally evil. (Galatians 5:19-21). It is never
right to steal (Ephesians 4:28). It is never right to lie (Revelation 21:8). It is never right to be a
murderer, a thief, an evildoer, or a busybody. (1 Peter 4:15). There are no circumstances under which
these things can be done without sinning.
It is unconditionally evil to teach a false doctrine or teach “for doctrine and commandments of men.”
(Matthew 15:9, 13). John declares that those teachers who “abide not in the doctrine of Christ” have
not God. And that we cannot facilitate nor encourage them in anyway without sinning. (2 John. 9, 10).
To be unconditionally evil, a thing does not have to be condemned by name in the Scriptures. It may be
condemned by general biblical principles. Gambling, cheating on tests, embezzlement, mixed swimming,
prom dancing and most other dancing are a few examples of such things.
Circumstantial Evil
If a thing is inherently evil, there are no circumstances that can make it good.
However, if a thing is inherently good, it can be made evil by the circumstances. Unfortunately most of us
only concern ourselves with avoiding just those things that can be proven to be sinful of themselves. There
is more to consider than just whether a thing is lawful. One must consider whether the thing is expedient
and edifying. (Romans 14:14; 1 Corinthians 10:23). Some things lawful within themselves can be so
inexpedient under certain circumstances that they become sinful. For example, Paul, after declaring that
generally speaking it was lawful to eat meats that have been offered to idols, described circumstances
under which such eating would be sinful (1 Corinthians 8:10-12).
One needs to be aware that he cannot indiscriminately practice such authorized liberties. Sure, these
liberties are lawful, good, and right within themselves. However, if they are done at a time and place
that causes another to be offended (stumble into sin) they become sinful to the one practicing them
(Romans 14:15-21; 1 Corinthians 8:8-13). Also, unless one can do the thing with full assurance of faith
rather than doubt it becomes sinful (Romans 14:14, 23). The apostle further indicates that if such
lawful liberties destroy peace or hinder edification among brethren they should be avoided (Romans
14:19-20).
A thing can be good in one setting and evil in another. Paul said so much on the subject of eating
meats offered to idols. It was good to buy it at the marketplace and take it home and eat it (1
Corinthians 10:25). It was also lawful to attend a neighbor’s feast and eat whatever meat was served
unless the neighbor states that the meat was offered to the idol – which would indicate that he was
eating out of deference to the idol (1 Corinthians 10:27, 28). But what if the feast is in the idols
temple? Paul indicates that this would be a circumstance where the probability of offense would be so
great that the Christian could not attend and sit at the idol’s table without sin (1 Corinthians
8:9-12; 10:16-22).
Then there are things that are morally good and beneficial, but religiously evil. Is a good practice
for one to wash his hands before eating. It is not a good practice to do it as a religious act (Matthew
15:1-9). Cornbread and milk make a great and morally right supper. But they do not belong on the Lord’s
table. In fact, they would be evil there. Instrumental music can be culturally beneficial. But as an
act of worship it is without divine sanction, and therefore sinful.
There is nothing inherently wrong with moving pictures, with or without sound, either on TV or the big
screen – but they can be made wrong by their content. The truth of the business is that most of these
today have been made sinful due to their immoral, vulgar, profanity laced and licentious content. There
is nothing sinful about a card game or spitting at a crack in the floor, but they can be made sinful by
injecting gambling into the mix.
There is certainly nothing inherently wrong with brothers and sisters in Christ eating a common meal
together unless they do it “as a church.” (1 Corinthians 11:18 NKJ). Such meals belong in the realm of
the home (1 Corinthians 11:22, 34).
So, you see there are some things that are perfectly good that can be made wrong by the circumstances
under which they are done. There is more to consider than just if a thing is lawful or morally upright
of itself. One must consider the circumstances under which they are done.
Potential Evil
There are things that one would do well to avoid because of their potential for evil. There are actions
that we take and relationships that we form that seem innocent enough in their initial stages that
ultimately lead to very evil consequences. Sometimes these consequences may not be foreseeable. But
quite often, they are foreseeable if one will take a good honest and objective look at their potential
or propensity for evil.
I am not convinced that the Bible teaches that a Christian’s marrying a non-Christian is inherently
sinful. I have not found the passage or principle that definitely forbids it. Having said that, I
cannot recommend or encourage the practice because of the high probability that it will likely lead to
evil down the road. Because they do not share the same values there will likely be problems rearing
their children “in the nurture and admonition of the Lord”, budgeting their finances to include
scriptural giving, choosing their recreation and entertainment, and how they spend their weekends.
There are certain biblical standards that the Christian must appeal to in such matters that mean little
to a non-Christian.
When Lot made his decision to “pitch his tent” toward Sodom, it may have seemed to him to have been an
innocent move and a good business decision to choose those well watered plains of the Jordan (Genesis
13). No one could say that the move of itself was sinful. But given the reputation of those cities it
should have been easy enough for him to see the potential for evil in such a move. He paid a dear price
for his miscalculation.
When we as individual Christians or as local churches are contemplating some project or course of
action we would do well to take the long view. We need to ask, not only is this thing in its present
form scriptural, but what is its potential for evil down the road? What is the track record of similar
projects in the past? Are there any built-in potentials for abuse leading to evil? –
edbragwell@gmail.com